One of the more inefficient--and expensive--aspects of 3G network deployment is the need for mobile operators to deploy outdoors macro carriers to support indoor users. Now, what if we could install cellular base stations (or 3G radio hubs) in subscribers' homes or offices to deliver voice and data at carrier-grade quality but a fraction of the cost of outdoor macro carriers? In fact, we can: These low-power base stations are called femtocells, and more and more companies are warming up to the technology. There are many benefits for operators here, chief among them: the ability to calibrate capital investment so it is more in line with subscriber demand; the fact that the IP back haul is paid for by the subscriber; and the fact that femtocells would work with the standard mobile handsets already in use by millions of customers around the world. The latest developments:
For more on developments on the femtocell front:
- Dan Jones's Unstrung discussion [1] | report [2]
For more on femtocell technology:
- see the websites of picoChip [3] | 3Way Networks [4] | RadioFrame Networks [5] | AirWalk Communication [6] | Airvana [7] | IPAccess [8] | Ubiquisys [9]
- and Gabriel Brown's 22-page Unstrung Insider report [10]
Links:
[1] http://www.unstrung.com/document.asp?doc_id=116152
[2] http://www.unstrung.com/document.asp?doc_id=116281&WT.svl=news2_2
[3] http://www.picochip.com/products/femtocells
[4] http://www.3waynetworks.com/
[5] http://www.radioframenetworks.com/americas/americas.htm
[6] http://www.airwalkcom.com/
[7] http://www.airvananet.com/
[8] http://www.ipaccess.com/
[9] http://www.ubiquisys.com/ubiquisys2/
[10] http://www.unstrung.com/insider/