FierceWirelessFierceWirelessEuropeFierceDeveloperFierceMobileContentFierceBroadbandWirelessFierceVoIPFierceIPTVFierceTelecomFierceOnlineVideoFierceCable

LightSquared: Can it live up to its wholesale aspirations?

Tools

Harbinger's LightSquared promises to build a nationwide LTE network covering 260 million people by year-end 2015. Is this newcomer's business plan a smart strategy or a pipe dream?

Thanks to additional funding and an infrastructure deal, Philip Falcone and his private-equity firm Harbinger Capital Partners may be closer to making their nationwide wholesale LTE network a reality. Nevertheless, the firm's plans are drawing the ire of skeptics who believe it's unlikely the network will ever come to fruition.

Click here to watch LightSquared’s Sanjiv Ahuja introduce the company.Last week LightSquared (which is majority owned by Harbinger) announced it received an additional $1.75 billion in debt and equity financing, inked an eight-year, $7 billion deal with Nokia Siemens Networks to deploy an LTE network, and lined up a management team that includes veterans of Vodafone, Orange, Time Warner and more.

But this innovative startup (which is a Fierce 15 2010 winner) draws comparisons to Nextwave, the ill-fated venture that gained notoriety in 1996 for outbidding other operators in an FCC auction for valuable PCS spectrum. Nextwave went on to file for bankruptcy and then engaged in a high-profile battle with the FCC over its right to keep or sell its PCS licenses despite not having paid for them. "[LightSquared] brings to mind a few business models from the past--Iridium, Metricom and Nextwave--and none of them succeeded," said Mark Lowenstein, managing director of Mobile Ecosystem, an industry research and consulting firm.

Controversy, skepticism surround LightSquared's proposition

Part of the reason for the skepticism may lie in the way LightSquared acquired its spectrum. After receiving a nod from the FCC to merge with mobile satellite firm SkyTerra in March, Harbinger revealed its plans to use a little-known FCC rule that allows mobile satellite spectrum holders to back up their satellite coverage with towers. The result is clearance to build a conventional ground-based terrestrial wireless network in conjunction with a satellite network. Under the current rules, all devices that LightSquared or its wholesale partners use will have to connect to the satellite network, which some believe will drive up the cost of devices and limit the section.

Nor does LightSquared's plan sit well with AT&T and Verizon Wireless. In approving the merger of SkyTerra and Harbinger, the FCC also approved a provision that Harbinger wanted that requires SkyTerra to ask for approval before leasing capacity on the network to the largest or second-largest wireless provider. And AT&T (NYSE:T) and Verizon (NYSE:VZ) (the second largest and largest wireless carriers, respectively) have been forbidden from holding more than 25 percent of the spectrum. Verizon and AT&T have petitioned the FCC, arguing the LightSquared network provisions are not in line with the open ethos the FCC has trumpeted.

To meet the FCC guidelines, LightSquared must build its network out quickly, and some question its ability to secure enough funding to meet the requirements. The company is planning initial trials in Baltimore, Denver, Las Vegas and Phoenix, with the network set to launch before third quarter of 2011. LightSquared must cover 100 million people by the end of 2012, 145 million people by the end of 2013 and at least 260 million people by the end of 2015 (Harbinger has set these timetables and the FCC has approved them).

Meeting wholesale demands

Regulatory guidelines aside, the rest of LightSquared's proposition is straightforward. Chief Marketing Officer Frank Boulben said demand for mobile data will increase 44 percent in the next few years, and the company plans to cater to that demand though its wholesale partner network. Unlike Clearwire (NASDAQ:CLWR), which also provides wholesale network capacity to investors such as Sprint Nextel (NYSE:S), Comcast and Time Warner, among others, Boulben said LightSquared has no intention of offering its own broadband service. "We won't compete with our wholesale customers, and every dollar we make will go to network quality and coverage," he added.

Boulben said LightSquared has already talked to more than 30 companies that are interested in partnering with the firm. This includes a combination of wireline operators, cable operators, rural carriers, retailers and even device makers. But don't expect these wholesale partners to become strategic investors in the company. Boulben said LightSquared is more interested in finding financial investors, at least initially.  

Clearwire, meanwhile, wouldn't comment on LightSquared other than to say that it welcomes the new entrant. "The mobile broadband market will be large enough to be served by multiple providers. We are confident in our ability to continue to meet this growing demand through our Clear brand and the brands of our wholesale partners," Clearwire said in a statement.

Understanding the network specifics

LightSquared has access to 59 MHz of spectrum at 1.6 GHz and at 1.4 GHz, and plans to deploy LTE with 5 MHz for the downlink and 5 MHz for the uplink. However, only 13 MHz of LightSquared's 59 MHz of spectrum is available for its terrestrial-only services.

LightSquared Chief Marketing Officer Frank Boulben Boulben said the company's spectrum will support superior indoor penetration. "It's just the law of physics," he said. "The quality of our spectrum combined with the specifications from NSN means we can deliver a high quality of service. And QoS is something that is essential in the U.S. market."

To complement the terrestrial LTE network, LightSquared will deploy two geostationary satellites that will provide backup coverage. "On 100 percent of territory of the U.S.--as long as you can see the sky--you will be able to place a phone call, text or email from your device, data card or smartphone," Boulben said.

The company plans to launch one satellite between December and March of next year. Boulben said the geostationary satellite is being made by Boeing and will be launched in Kazakhstan.

Boulben said most LightSquared partners will want to use LightSquared's terrestrial network, but he expects the satellite component to appeal to three segments: public safety, machine-to-machine apps and services in rural areas.

But for some, Boulben's description sounds a bit too good to be true. Peter Jarich, analyst with Current Analysis, said LightSquared's claim of having better indoor penetration may be true, but it still depends on how the network is constructed.

And of bigger concern, at least to Jarich, is not the network, but the devices. Jarich said LightSquared's unique spectrum position and satellite requirements could make it difficult for the company to obtain suitable devices. "Will vendors build devices that are not in the regular band?" Jarich asked, noting AT&T and Verizon both plan to use 700 MHz spectrum for their respective LTE buildouts.

Boulben said LightSquared has contracts for devices and chipsets, but is not ready to publicly talk about those deals. "We will communicate more in the fall about our ecosystem," he said.

Managing the network

Sue Spradley, head of Nokia Siemens Networks' North American Division, Key to LightSquared's deal with Nokia Siemens Networks is that NSN will not only build the network, but will also manage it. Sue Spradley, head of Nokia Siemens Networks' North American Division, said the company is confident about its ability to handle the terrestrial and satellite components to the LTE network because NSN has worked with other satellite firms and understands how to manage roaming between terrestrial and satellite elements.

For NSN, the LightSquared deal is a crucial win. Nokia Siemens, which recently inked a deal to acquire Motorola's networks business for $1.2 billion, has been working hard to increase its North American presence--and the high-profile LightSquared win takes the company to a new level. "Most managed services deals involve a big organization being integrated into NSN, and come with a transition period to get the people costs to the right level. With LightSquared, from day one we are hiring the right head count and talent. I don't bring on individuals that we don't need," Spradley said.

Spradley expressed confidence that the LightSquared team will be able to move from concept to reality. In fact, some NSN employees have worked with members of the LightSquared team in their past positions at other operators. "This isn't your average startup with three guys in a garage," Spradley said. "These guys know what it takes to build a network. They have the operator and vendor experience and the Wall Street experience--and that's a powerful combination."


SHARE
WITH:
Email Twitter Facebook LinkedIn StumbleUpon
Get Your FREE FierceBroadbandWireless Email Newsletter:

Comments (5) | Post a comment
More stories about clearwire   Sprint   Satellite Network   Nokia Siemens Networks   LightSquared   Harbinger Capital Partners   Harbinger  

Comments

AT&T and Verizon both buy equipment from NSN. This deal clearly puts NSN in competition with them. Why don't AT&T and Verizon sever their relationship with NSN and then see how excited Miss Spradley is about this deal? After all that's ultimately why the old AT&T had to spin out Lucent as a separate manufacturing company - The RBOC's didn't want to fund (buy equipment) from a company that had an arm that competed with them.
NSN supplies products and services to AT&T, Verizon, TMobile, CenturyLink, Qwest, USCellular, Leap, Cricket, and many others. How does providing managed services for LightSquared differ? Ericsson operates Sprint's network. They are a supplier to AT&T and Verizon and the others. The big carriers actually appreciate their vendors having scale and do not at all discourage services based support of the competition.
If I read correctly, LightSquared will be able to use a total of 13 MHz of spectrum terrestrially? With only 13 MHz of spectrum, how can they hope to offer a competitive wholesale broadband service...it's all about bits per HZ and if we are liberal in our assertions about the spectral efficiency they will be able to achieve and quote 4 bits per HZ (unlikely), that is only a total of 52 Mbps of throughput capacity...even with oversubscription...still not nearly enough to be competitive in areas other than rural and underserved areas that would leverage the satellite option...but this is already being done by SkyTerra...I don't see the value proposition...someone please help me understand?
In the article only 5MHz is mentioned for UL/DL so it would be even less than (13MHz X spectrum efficiency) . With 5MHz FDD their network won't be better than a standard HSPA single carrier network, not to mention Dual carrier HSPA.
There is nothing clever about it. The launch of an LTE network on an uncommon brand will require specialized devices specific for that band frequency not common to devices and band frequencies being utilized by the majority of US operators (Tier1-Tier3) today. Limited size and scope of Light Square will make it difficult to order the necessary handset volumes resulting in more expensive handsets and less variety then what is common amongst the other operators. The US Tier2/Tier 3 US service provider market is faced with many challenges including competing with the larger Tier 1 carriers for market share, CAPEX/OPEX of new network rollout and lack of compelling handsets. Unfortunately few of these issues will be effectively solved by Light Square market entry. Wholesale services for these operators would be most useful if it extended its existing network allowing smaller operators to increase its subscriber base and grow organically. Unfortunately the model with Light Square would be a rip and replace strategy on an uncommon band frequency with limited coverage and device availability. The only operators that may be open to such a model would one’s that are yet to define their 3G/4G strategy which would most commonly be found in the rural US markets amongst the Tier 3 Operators. The company has indicated that it has no plans to roll-out its network to these rural markets. Light Square will rely on its satellite roaming to service these markets which unfortunately is still an expensive option and quite frankly available to many of these operators today. Light Square seems to be positioning themselves as wholesale solution for service providers. For the reasons above I believe that many of the Tier 2/Tier 3 operators will not see Light Square as a viable solution. The company has also indicated it will not compete directly with the service providers limiting its ability to go after the one potential revenue generator, the enterprise market. Given that Light Square remains true to its business model it may focus on creating new operators. Unfortunately an MVNO business model thus far has been a difficult nut to crack. Voice and data connectivity rates continue to decline making the viability of MVNO to make money more difficult from traditional voice/data wholesale rates. If large brands like Disney have failed at it I think there are definite issues with the existing MVNO models today. Even with an all IP network I still think this will not be a large revenue generating stream to justify sustainable business model for Light Squared. What the US market requires for wholesale is a network on a common band frequency allowing for operators to scale, offload traffic and gain access to a number of compelling smart phones not available for them today because of size and scalability issues. Unfortunately this will never happen as this spectrum has already been spoken for by many of the Tier 1s. Light Square may have also reduced its competitive edge by early announcement of its market plans. Network plans rolling are scheduled to launch mid-late 2011 in niche markets but realistically the company will not make a subscriber dent till sometime late 2012. The Tier 1’s have already shown their disapproval of Lightsquare’s existence and the time lag gives them nearly 2 years to develop strategy plans based on compelling offerings or acquisition strategies to knock the company off its feet even before they get started. Bottom line Light Square is wholesale hype, that tells a bid story but solves nothing.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.