FierceWirelessFierceWirelessEuropeFierceDeveloperFierceMobileContentFierceBroadbandWirelessFierceVoIPFierceIPTVFierceTelecomFierceOnlineVideoFierceCable

Free Newsletter

About | View Sample | Privacy

Dumbing down the broadband stimulus process

According to the blog StimulatingBroadband.com, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) is in the process of mailing an estimated 1,400 rejection letters to those entities that applied for the first round of broadband stimulus funding. The NTIA is hoping to mail out the bulk of letters by Jan. 30, and the agency's aim is to make all award announcements by the end of February. To date, only 14 awards have been granted, and the majority are middle-mile projects.

Wow. That only gives those entities wanting to apply for the second round two weeks to firm up their applications before they are due on March 15. That's because the proposed service areas in the first round that won are ineligible for funding in the second round. To ease the problem, NTIA and the Rural Utilities Service (RUS) plan to release an electronic map the identifies what geographic areas have been given grants or will soon be given grants. But Fred Campbell, president and CEO of the Wireless Communications Association International (WCAI), argues that such a map is of little use to applicants. In a letter to NTIA head Larry Strickling and RUS administrator Jonathan Adelstein, Campbell said the maps don't break out middle-mile and last-mile projects nor does it specify the number of applications pending for a given area or who they even are. He wants more information released to the public so applicants can make solid decisions.

Meanwhile, it appears that companies such as DigitalBridge, WindTalk and OpenRange--those with wireless last-mile applications that span several states--are likely to receive rejection letters. It's becoming evident that NTIA favors more simple projects that span just one community because they're easier to measure new subscriptions. Moreover, it appears fiber-based middle-mile projects are the favorite.

Both trends are a big disappointment to those who painstakingly crafted some pretty creative applications on the last-mile side. Middle-mile projects are the safe and conservative bet.

Daniel Hays, partner with PRTM, believes a reliance on middle-mile projects is a mistake. Most are designed to wire up major institutions and provide a cost-effective hub for last-mile connections. But will there be an incentive for last-mile providers to connect to them?

"The piece I have have found most disappointing is the decreased emphasis on last-mile projects, and that's a real big problem," Hays said. "Most of the applications in the first round were last mile. I question whether middle-mile projects are really going to satisfy the needs of those that are underserved by broadband. The middle-mile projects are going to take a long time to come to fruition themselves and even longer to deliver broadband."

In the first round, Robert Anderson, CEO of WindTalk, proposed to roll out WiMAX in 10 states. He's assuming his company wasn't granted any funding in the first round. For the second round, he plans to play up the middle mile by proposing to deploy Huawei gear that features a six-slot BTS and fiber backhaul so that the company can deploy both WiMAX and LTE to serve as an affiliate of sorts to help big operators like Sprint and AT&T extend mobile broadband services into areas that aren't economical for them to do so.

"We think we were cleaver but we may have gone too big," Anderson said. "The only way to survive is to become an affiliate."

Anderson also has interesting plans in the works to sell computer gear, 950 gigaflop supercomputers powered by its equipment that is, to schools. He's been in discussions with UMass Dartmouth Physics Professor Gaurav Khanna and UMass Dartmouth Principal Investigator Chris Poulin who have created a step-by-step guide to building a homemade supercomputer using a grid of Sony Playstation 3 processors.

Unfortunately, I think there are going to be many disillusioned applicants from the first round disappointed by the fact that the NTIA and RUS can't see the forsight in any complex and creative applications because they don't have the time nor resources. It's just too scary. Apparently everyone needs to dumb down their applications in the next round.--Lynnette


SHARE
WITH:
Email Twitter Facebook LinkedIn StumbleUpon
Get Your FREE FierceBroadbandWireless Email Newsletter:

Comments (5) | Post a comment
More stories about RUS   Jonathan Adelstein   Larry Strickling   WCAI   WindTalk   DigitalBridge Communications   Open Range Communications   Ntia   broadband stimulus   Stimulus  

Comments

Who is this guy and why is he touted as an expert?
Who are you referring to? --Lynnette
This doesn't sound like what Obama proposed when he ran for office.
How is it "becoming evident that NTIA favors more simple projects that span just one community"? Basing investment decisions on the ease of measuring new subscriptions (as you state) would be very short sighted. Your assumptions might also be flawed if you are basing your comments on the 2 sets of announcement that have already been made. In this case, I doubt that these early announcements are an indicator of future recipients, but rather some of the safest bets based on past experience and political ties. Is a pattern of smaller awards sustainable? Smaller projects = smaller capital requirements = more individual applications being approved through the broadband stimulus program. Does NTIA or RUS have the resources at their disposal to manage and oversee such a large quantity of small projects? Or is it more likely that they will begin choosing more substantial/material projects that have a larger scope, thus getting a “bigger bang for their buck” from an oversight and management perspective? In addition, I agree that a propensity towards middle mile projects would be a mistake. Funding last mile projects “pulls” significant demand for middle mile solutions (while still connecting anchor institutions), but assuming that middle mile networks will “push” service providers to deploy last mile networks is a high risk assumption…especially when the success of this program will be measured by the increase in broadband adoption by end-users, and not by the availability of middle mile connectivity.
Apparently Strickling said as much this week. I agree with everything you say.--Lynnette

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

To combat spam, please enter the code in the image.