FierceWirelessFierceWirelessEuropeFierceDeveloperFierceMobileContentFierceBroadbandWirelessFierceVoIPFierceIPTVFierceTelecomFierceOnlineVideo

Free Newsletter

About | View Sample | Privacy
Related Topics >> WiMAX | hsdpa | 3G | 4G

The HSPA PR machine heats up as WiMAX heats up

Tools


As I recently noted, WiMAX is pulling into the reality station. As such, I suspect we'll see some major opponents step up the public-relations effort to label WiMAX as simply hype. Recently, the GSM Association reminded the industry that HSPA (High Speed Packet Access) is here today.

David Pringle, spokesman for the GSMA, recently told Network World that while WiMAX has received a great deal of attention, the technology's working models still can't outperform HSPA's current technology, which can download data at 7 Mbps.

"We're close to developing HSPA networks that will reach speeds of 14Mbps," he said. "You don't see any early WiMAX network performing that fast. A WiMAX provider would have to build a very dense network to outperform HSPA." (Also, see the GSMA's study about HSPA's momentum in today's Spotlight story).

Ericsson, the only major infrastructure vendor to keep out of the WiMAX market, has the same view. A white paper issued earlier this year spells out what Ericsson calls HSPA's advantages over WiMAX. As an executive from the company emailed me recently: WiMAX's "claims are not really substantiated and we now see that WiMAX is just another 3G technology, only that it is some years after HSPA."

For sure, pushing HSPA is smart positioning strategy given the fact that LTE (Long Term Evolution) technology, the "4G" path to HSPA, is lagging WiMAX by about two years. Ericsson, the world's largest infrastructure supplier, has been working to accelerate the adoption of HSPA before WiMAX shows up in force.

Ericsson today introduced infrastructure and device platforms for WCDMA/HSPA in the 2.6 GHz frequency band, where new licenses for wireless broadband services are becoming available globally. Most view that band along with the 2.5 GHz and 3.5 GHz as bands ripe for WiMAX growth. Recently, the vendor announced its first HSPA module for laptops and other client devices, aiming for 50 percent of notebook computers to adopt HSPA modules by 2011. In India, where WiMAX is supposed to make some significant inroads, Ericsson launched an initiative to introduce the benefits of HSPA technology in rural India and connect communities to high-speed Internet services. Last month, Ericsson introduced the U335 WCDMA mobile platform designed to enable handset providers to create mass-market HSPA multimedia devices capable of offering services such as mobile TV, mobile video blogging and other services that require both high uplink and downlink data speeds.

But do operators believe HSPA is enough to stave off competition from WiMAX? As ABI Research notes, operators are in a state of flux as they decide which IP-OFDMA path they want to go with for the next generation. Is there justification to make investments now? Vodafone is looking to WiMAX for some of its newer markets such as the Middle East and Eastern Europe; BT and Telecom Italia Mobile are also showing interest. And ABI Research understands that another as yet unnamed "major European mobile operator" is "seriously considering WiMAX."

As Accenture's Shahid Ahmed last week said, 4G is not just about high data speeds, but embracing a new business model revolving around open access. It appears that model works best in an IP-OFDMA environment given the fact that non-subsidized electronics devices are a key element. WiMAX is designed from the start with that business model in mind. I suspect, however, that many operators will closely watch Sprint Nextel's foray into this open-access environment with its WiMAX deployments in the U.S. to see how fast open access catches on.-Lynnette

More stories about WiMAX   hsdpa   3G   4G  

Comments

While HSPA is for 3G, mobile WiMAX is for 4G. They may look alike in 3G applications, but will show a different phase later on, when technology shakedown progresses. Still, mobile devices that best represent mobile WIMAX haven't showed up on the market. Sprint's WiMAX push seems to be shakey now, but will get wider support from consumers as well as developers in view of user-centric features, including interoperability.
In Novarum's real-world testing of deployed networks using fixed WiMax, cellular and metro WiFi ... it is very clear that cellular TODAY has the same performance as fixed WiMax and much greater footprint. And that metro WiFi - where deployed well - outperforms both. Both metro WiFi and mobile WiMax will have applications, but it would be silly to rule out cellular. HSPA, LTE and metro WiFi all have dramatic increases in performance in the pipe ... and cost reductions as well. Fixed WiMax is rather stagnant and we are just beginning to see the deployment of mobile WiMax - it is likely to suffer from overhype ... just like all the other technologies. Wireless networks are paralleling the world of wired IP networks - initially many standards - token ring, token bus, Ethernet, ATM ... for both local and wide area networks. And in the end .. Ethernet slowly takes over all wire. It will be interesting to see how the wireless world develops.
I am managing consultant of MobileStack, a consulting company for wireless technology. The biggest problem for "mobile" WiMAX will be battery-power. Remember, people had been talking about WiFi on mobile devices for last 6-years. WiMAX will go down into history in a similar way. WiMAX standards needs "major changes" for WiMAX to be optimized for "battery power" and be ready for prime-time in the mobile-space. Now on LTE. LTE deployments will be delayed because of "major" architecture changes in LTE. LTE has chosen "distributed RNC" as an architecture (for good reasons that I understand). However, to stabilize such an architecture will take some-time. It requires large-scale FOA to prove that such an architecture will work in a scalable manner. This will delay LTE deployments for, at least, 2 years (based on history behind us). So, HSPA or 3G has a lot of life left in it. Operators, thinking of going to 4G directly from GSM, will have to "wait" for a long-time for LTE to be ready for prime-time. So, they need to evaluate if such an approach is well worth it for them.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

What is 77 + 5?
To combat spam, please solve the math question above.