FierceWirelessFierceWirelessEuropeFierceDeveloperFierceMobileContentFierceBroadbandWirelessFierceVoIPFierceIPTVFierceTelecomFierceOnlineVideo

Free Newsletter

About | View Sample | Privacy
Related Topics >> Muni WiFi

Residents unhappy with Portland's muni-WiFi

Tools

Portland's experiment with universal wireless Internet access was launched with much fanfare late last year, but many residents say the network does not deliver on its promise. The city contracted to have the network cover some 30 blocks east of downtown, but people who live in the area say that access is not available indoors, and also not available in more than a few outdoor locations. Since MetroFi, the contractor that built the network, did not design it to reach indoors, residents are left with no option but to buy a signal booster, at a cost of between $120 to $400, so they can use the free Internet connection.

MetroFi admits that it should have more aggressively advertised the limitations of the system it was building, thus avoiding unrealistic expectations. MetroFi's deal with Portland called for the company to build a network that covers 95 percent of the city by mid-2008, offer free Internet access, provide downloads above 1 Mbps and that is supported by advertising.

MetroFi currently has 68 antennas operating in less than 5 percent of the city. The company plans to activate 230 antennas after the city completes a review of current network performance. MetroFi and the city say that criticism of the network notwithstanding, their records show that the number of monthly users increased from 3,500 in December to 4,700 in February.

For more on Portland's metro-WiFi:
- see Mike Rogoway's OregonLive report

MORE: MetroFi's experience in Portland is not unique, as more and more service providers are finding that fulfilling promises of citywide coverage over the unlicensed spectrum is more difficult than anticipated. SkyPilot sees a market opportunity here, and yesterday it unveiled its SkyAccess DualBand--a new AP the company hopes will help fill gaps in wide-area WiFi networks at a relatively low expense. Richard Martin's InformationWeek report.

More stories about Muni WiFi  

Comments

So what's the point of having a metro wifi if it's not going to work indoors? The people are paying for the service with their tax dollars, along with local businesses. If availability is only present standing on a street corner, having a picnic or while in your car, this is worthless and IMHO not worth the money that municipalities are spending tax payer dollars. I live in a community where they have struck a deal (with Metrofi, I think) to implement a metro wifi technology. If this is what we have to expect, I say spend the money elsewhere.
Does everyone understand that the frequencies used in Wifi have a harder time penetrating walls than cellular signals? If you have trouble getting cell coverage in your house currently, don't expect that a muni wifi network is going to perform any better.
Recently I got a notebook and was delighted to find that it picked up wifi from a nearby (about 100 yds) location, strong and clear, and I was enjoying surfing the internet. However after the first 2 days the signal disappeared! Each time I logged on, a dialog box would appear saying that there was no signal available! This is surprising, because, as I said for the first 2 days everything was fine. Can anyone please tell me what's the problem? I would be be grateful! Thanks

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

To combat spam, please enter the code in the image.