FierceWirelessFierceWirelessEuropeFierceDeveloperFierceMobileContentFierceBroadbandWirelessFierceVoIPFierceIPTVFierceTelecomFierceOnlineVideoFierceCable

Free Newsletter

About | View Sample | Privacy

Round 2 of broadband simulus awards: Are you disillusioned or eager?

Tools

Are you ready to tackle the next round of broadband stimulus applications? Last week the The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) and the Department of Agriculture's Rural Utilities Service (RUS) released rules for this second round, and once again, applicants have a short time frame to sort out new, separate and lengthly rules from both the NTIA and RUS.

The deadline for applicants is March 15, which is once again causing potential applicants to scramble to understand the new rules. One major headache, however, should be fixed as applicants aren't required to submit the complex information they were required to give in the first round. That information is only required if they are called on to give due diligence.

Yet, one major snag I see is the fact that applicants in this second round really don't have much visibility as to what these agencies are looking for in terms of proposals because the agencies have delayed the process a few times and are just now trickling out awards to what appears to be the low-hanging fruit, such as broadband adoption grants and some middle-mile grants. Just yesterday, NTIA announced grants totaling $63 million to expand broadband access and adoption in Massachusetts, Michigan and North Carolina. It has now awarded 15 grants totaling about $200 million out of the $4.1 billion that is supposed to be awarded. RUS has not issued any awards yet.

That's disappointing to those wanting to apply for the second round as that first round was supposed to tell us a lot about what to expect from these agencies--what type of proposals they are favoring--in the second round. Still, there are some positive changes, those who have pored over the nearly 200 pages of documents report. For instance, RUS has eliminated the "remote, non-remote" qualifications, noted Successful.com's Craig Settles in a recent blog post. This will make more areas eligible for grants.

I will be waiting to see if this next round will be just as oversubscribed as the first. If you remember some 2,200 applicants filed for grants and loans. It seems that many of the applicants sitting around for the first round are getting a bit disillusioned. As one commenter said in response to an article I wrote about the new rules last week: "We are still waiting to see the split of the first round. After the initial $182M winners were announced we hoped things will start to roll quickly but ... given the performance until now, I give little faith. For me it's just publicity and PR."--Lynnette


SHARE
WITH:
Email Twitter Facebook LinkedIn StumbleUpon
Get Your FREE FierceBroadbandWireless Email Newsletter:

Comments (3) | Post a comment
More stories about Department Of Agriculture   Rural Utilities Service   Ntia   Stimulus  

Comments

The problem with this process is the total lack of communication. We were told that we'd get some kind of feedback from round 1...How do you improve an application if you don't know what you omitted or errors you made. Does one simply repackage the original app and hope that is enough?
My customers stopped most fiber optic work 3 months ago because they are expecting stimulus funding. The thought is, why should I spend my money when I can get the government's money? The delay in making first round awards has put my small company in jeopardy of going out of business.
We applied for a $15M RUS BTOP broadband wireless project in Round 1. We never received any questions asked about our application before we got one of the 1400 rejection letters. The rejection said our application was "incomplete" with no specifics. As far as we can tell they never read the application because it was as complete as it could have been with their ever changing rules. The government then awarded $181M to the State of PA for a Middle Mile fiber project application that followed NONE of the guidelines at that time..but seems to be closer to what they they now want in Round 2 applications. The new rules make it very clear that they will give money to whatever " Public /Private Partnerships they deem "deserving" without regard to any " published rules". Why bother with Round 2 if they change the rules after applications are submitted , without regard to any previously published bid guidelines. The new FCC story is they want 100Mb to all households in the US. Does that mean any "last mile round 2 applications" neeed to provide that BW? They say 5Mb min up/down today but maybe they will change that before the money is allocated. Why not..thay are the government and they can do whatebver they want. That's what they did in Round 1!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

To combat spam, please enter the code in the image.