FierceWirelessFierceWirelessEuropeFierceDeveloperFierceMobileContentFierceBroadbandWirelessFierceVoIPFierceIPTVFierceTelecomFierceOnlineVideoFierceCable

Free Newsletter

About | View Sample | Privacy
Related Topics >> Zte | WiMAX Forum | WiMAX 2 | sequans | Mo Shakouri | LTE

WiMAX 2: The WiMAX Forum's response to TD-LTE

Tools

Lynnette LunaThe WiMAX Forum is going on the defensive this week during the WiMAX Forum Congress Asia in Taipei, Taiwan. The group is speeding up its time table to deliver the next generation of WiMAX--a reaction to heavy data use among WiMAX subscribers as well as the looming threat posed by Qualcomm and Ericsson's lobbying for TD-LTE in India.

Last week the forum launched a global initiative to accelerate advanced WiMAX features that would double peak data rates and increase average and cell edge end user performance by 50 percent.

Mo Shakouri, vice president with the WiMAX Forum, said enhancements to the current generation of WiMAX weren't on the forum's roadmap, but were brought to the forefront at the urging of several WiMAX operators already facing capacity crunches. The forum reports that the average usage of data on WiMAX networks is close to 10 GB. Clearwire recently reported that mobile users average more than 7 GB of usage per month. In Russia, mobile WiMAX operator Yota sees more than 1 GB per month in data traffic from subscribers using its HTC smartphone. For laptops, it's 13 GB per month.

"Demand for data is moving so fast that we were pushed by many people to add this functionality," Shakouri said.

The WiMAX Forum has also been prodded to announce more detailed plans for 802.16m, and step up the timeline for its development via a new group called the WiMAX 2 Collaboration Initiative, which is made up of vendors Samsung, Alvarion, Motorola, ZTE, Sequans, Beceem, GCT Semiconductor and XRONet. The companies will work in tandem with the WiMAX Forum and WiMAX operators to accelerate the next-generation standard. WiMAX 2, the marketing name for the 802.16m standard, is expected to expand capacity to 300 Mbps peak rates via advances in antennas, channel stacking and frequency re-use.

The forum previously forecast 802.16m would hit in 2012 or 2013. But increasing demands for data--coupled with Qualcomm and Ericsson urging Indian mobile broadband license bidders to go with TD-LTE--motivated the forum to put some stakes in the ground and declare that WiMAX 2 equipment will meet certification by the end of 2011.

"There has been a lot of noise about TD-LTE, and the WiMAX Forum had not specifically given dates regarding timelines for 802.16m," Shakouri said. "Basically our announcement around 802.16m came about because of the noise in India."

The formation of the WiMAX 2 Collaboration Initiative is a marked change from the way the first generation of WiMAX was developed. Sprint Nextel was the entity driving the majority of the standards work as it was eager to get to market and begin building an ecosystem. Vendors are now taking the lead and driving equipment readiness before the 802.16m standard is finalized by the end of this year. Shakouri said the standard is 95 percent finished.

"Those companies are going to take a more active role inside the forum," Shakouri said. "They have all come together to speed up the process."

The group of vendors plans to collaborate on interoperability testing, performance benchmarking and application development before the WiMAX Forum establishes its certification program to narrow the gap between the finalized standard and commercial rollouts.

So how much of a threat is TD-LTE to WiMAX? Shakouri said the answer depends on spectrum decisions. "At this moment, the spectrum we are focusing on is separate, aside from what Qualcomm announced in India," Shakouri said. He also said that a TD-LTE ecosystem is at least two to three years behind WiMAX.

Many analysts speculate that TD-LTE will become the crossover technology that will prompt WiMAX operators to flip to LTE. Clearwire was part of a group of operators and vendors that last month asked the 3GPP standards body to begin working on specifications that would enable TD-LTE to be deployed in the 2.6 GHz band, which Clearwire uses for WiMAX. During the CTIA Wireless 2010 trade show last month, Clearwire CEO Bill Morrow reiterated the company's interest in deploying LTE when the technology catches up to WIMAX. He also called for one standard down the road.

Another initiative the forum is announcing this week is the launch of its Open Retail Initiative, a global program aimed at driving WiMAX into consumer devices sold directly or through retail channels that can be activated by the consumer over the air on the network. If you remember the evangelism of early WiMAX advocates like Barry West, this capability was supposed to be the Holy Grail of the technology.

During last month's CTIA show, Morrow also reiterated Clearwire's goal of inserting WiMAX into a plethora of consumer devices, ranging from digital cameras to gaming devices, and indicated the company has been in discussions with consumer electronics companies and could announce plans in the coming months. Still, checks with WiMAX chip vendors indicate that embedding chips in such devices is still in its infancy.

Shakouri characterized the initiative as one that will drive the entire WiMAX ecosystem since operators won't have to shoulder customer acquisition costs. Five certification labs will open in May, with a sixth one coming in the fall.

But questions remain. Will WiMAX regain is significant time-to-market advantage over LTE, which eroded due to the longer-than-expected time it took WiMAX to roll out? And will these initiatives keep WiMAX operators like Clearwire from jumping ship in the long run? --Lynnette


SHARE
WITH:
Email Twitter Facebook LinkedIn StumbleUpon
Get Your FREE FierceBroadbandWireless Email Newsletter:

Comments (8) | Post a comment
More stories about Zte   WiMAX Forum   WiMAX 2   sequans   Mo Shakouri   LTE   Data Traffic   clearwire   Beceem   Barry West   Alvarion   802.16m  

Comments

TD-LTE is a hard sell in India. Huawei and ZTE would love to see Qcom succeed, nonetheless. Can't say the same to Ericsson.
Here in China, you can see TD-LTE advertized as indigenous Chinese technology. Not complety correct, but also not wrong, as there is a lot of Chinese IPR in TD-LTE that was developed for the extremely delayed TD-SCDMA. India already had a hard time settling royalty issues with Qualcomm, so selling TD-LTE is India is only possible if the Chinese issue IPR waivers and trust me, this won't happen. The Chinese IPR claims are not out for the simple reason that the LTE camp haven't done their homework yet (and royalties potential will perhaps be higher after operator decisions are made). WiMAX Rel-1 does the same technically and has close to all IPR issues settled. Acc to reports, Rel-1 will work out at roughly half the IPR cost of LTE Rel-8. Too much of a difference for the cost-conscious rural India deployments targeted in the upcoming BWA auction.
LTE release 8 = today's mobile WiMAX LTE release 10 = WiMAX 2 / 802.16m LTE rel 10 is a long way from being finalized, whereas comparatively 802.16m is on the near horizon. TD is typically preferable for low cost and low battery consumption needs of handheld and portable devices. Requires just the one radio that can be turned around...
I'm holding out for Wimax 88 / 802.16z or LTE release 99, whichever. Must be awesome to have the world as a QA and development environment. A little shake a lot of hype and millions of guinea pigs are available. How are customers who invest A LOT of money in todays Wimax treated when they are now being informed that the "Latest" tech they have is sub par?
The only thing sub-par in WiMAX is the ecosystem, which can't draw from a 25-year existence like LTE does given its GSM heritage. As Vinny explained and the mentioned user data consumption shows, today's WiMAX is not sub-par technically, but rather on-par with the TD-LTE coming in 2011. And WiMAX rel-2 is technically equivalent to LTE-Advanced ("Rel-10"), something we're not going to see from the LTE camp before 2014.
What does this mean if Intel is not in this initiative?
The fact Intel is not in the group underlines why the term "defensive" in the editorial is wrong wording. What this is can only be called an offensive. Initiative member Samsung already has a WiMAX 2 trial running for half a year, so it's not that 16m-based WiMAX 2 is mere theory. Rather first devices are out in the field, so the 2011 certification start date perhaps isn't as unrealistic as it may sound at first.
Now, here's the question: as an early WiMAX adopter in the US, how is performance going to degrade as more people start joining the network? I love the performance right now, but that's probably because I'm just one of two users on this cell.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.